Hands are among the most frequently used and vulnerable parts of the human body in workplaces across industries. Yet, they are often exposed to unnecessary risks in the name of "dexterity." Many workers forego adequate protection to maintain the fine motor control needed for specific tasks, leaving their hands susceptible to injuries that can have long-lasting consequences. This article explores the importance of hand protection, the significance of glove ratings, and how to choose the right gloves for different tasks.

The Prevalence of Hand Injuries

WorkSafe New Zealand consistently highlights the frequency and severity of hand injuries in workplace incidents. From crushed fingers in machinery to deep lacerations caused by sharp tools, these injuries can be debilitating. For example, recent reports from the meat processing and horticulture industries show how inadequate training and protection lead to severe hand damage. In one case, improper handling of a chain mechanism resulted in a worker’s hand being severely injured, prompting renewed safety initiatives. These incidents underscore the need for appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and robust training to mitigate risks.

Understanding Glove Ratings

One essential element of hand protection is understanding the markings and ratings on gloves. Many gloves are tested and rated according to specific standards, such as EN388 for mechanical risks. These ratings are often displayed on the back of the glove and include a series of numbers and letters representing performance in the following categories:

Abrasion Resistance (1-4): Measures the glove's ability to withstand surface wear.
Cut Resistance (1-5 or A-F): Indicates how well the glove can resist cuts from sharp objects.
Tear Resistance (1-4): Assesses how much force is required to tear the glove material.
Puncture Resistance (1-4): Reflects the glove’s ability to resist punctures from objects like nails or needles.
Impact Protection (P): Some gloves are marked with a "P" if they provide impact protection to the knuckles and other areas.

By understanding these ratings, workers and employers can select gloves that match the hazards of specific tasks, ensuring optimal protection without compromising functionality.

Matching Gloves to Tasks

Different tasks require different types of hand protection. Using the wrong gloves can lead to reduced performance, discomfort, or worse—injury. Below are examples of common workplace tasks and the types of gloves best suited for them:

1. General Handling and Construction

Hazards: Abrasions, cuts, and punctures.
Recommended Gloves: General-purpose work gloves with high abrasion and cut resistance, such as leather or reinforced synthetic gloves.

2. Asbestos Handling

Hazards: Skin irritation, environmental contamination, and inhalation of harmful substances.
Recommended Gloves: General-purpose work gloves with high abrasion and cut resistance, such as leather or reinforced synthetic gloves.
- Note: Gloves will need to disposed of after use, so a risk assessment will need to be carried out, considering the abrasion and cut resistance versus the costs.

3. Chemical Handling

Hazards: Skin irritation, chemical burns, and absorption of harmful substances.
Recommended Gloves: Chemical-resistant gloves made of nitrile, neoprene, or PVC, with clear labeling for specific chemical protection.

4. Electrical Work

Hazards: Electrical shocks and burns.
Recommended Gloves: Insulated rubber gloves tested for voltage resistance.

5. Precision Tasks

Hazards: Minimal physical risks but a need for dexterity.
Recommended Gloves: Thin, flexible gloves such as nitrile or PU-coated gloves that offer a balance of protection and fine motor control.

6. Heavy Machinery Operation & Concrete Handling

Hazards: Impact injuries, vibrations, and crushing hazards.
Recommended Gloves: Impact-resistant gloves with padding to reduce vibration exposure and protect against blunt force trauma.

Training and Proper Usage

Providing the right gloves is only part of the equation. Workers must be trained on the correct use and limitations of their gloves. For example:

Inspect gloves regularly for wear and tear, replacing them as needed.
Understand the limitations of specific gloves, such as chemical resistance or cut protection.
Ensure proper fit to prevent slipping or restricted movement.

Additionally, tasks requiring manual dexterity should not compromise safety. Employers must strike a balance by choosing gloves that offer adequate protection without hindering performance. Training should emphasize that dexterity and protection can coexist when the right gloves are selected.

The Cost of Complacency

Complacency in hand protection can lead to devastating consequences. Injuries not only affect workers physically and emotionally but also disrupt operations and increase costs for employers. Lost productivity, medical expenses, and legal repercussions are just some of the tangible impacts of inadequate hand protection.

Recent initiatives, such as WorkSafe’s focus on hand safety, stress the importance of proactive measures to prevent hand injuries. These measures include:

Conducting thorough risk assessments for tasks.
Investing in high-quality PPE.
Reinforcing a culture of safety through regular training and toolbox talks.

Final Words

Hands are an invaluable asset in the workplace, yet they are often the most exposed to risk. By understanding glove ratings and selecting appropriate hand protection for specific tasks, employers and workers can significantly reduce the likelihood of injuries. Training and vigilance are key to fostering a culture where safety and dexterity are equally valued. Remember, the cost of a pair of gloves is minimal compared to the cost of a hand injury—in both human and financial terms.

For more information, consult resources such as WorkSafe New Zealand’s guidelines on personal protective equipment and industry-specific safety recommendations.

Safety at Your Fingertips: Balancing Protection and Dexterity in the Workplace